↓ Skip to main content

Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first‐tier clinical diagnostic test: Estonian experience

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first‐tier clinical diagnostic test: Estonian experience
Published in
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/mgg3.57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga Žilina, Rita Teek, Pille Tammur, Kati Kuuse, Maria Yakoreva, Eve Vaidla, Triin Mölter-Väär, Tiia Reimand, Ants Kurg, Katrin Õunap

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is now established as the first-tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for fast and accurate detection of chromosomal abnormalities in patients with developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). We present our experience with using CMA for postnatal and prenatal diagnosis in Estonian patients during 2009-2012. Since 2011, CMA is on the official service list of the Estonian Health Insurance Fund and is performed as the first-tier cytogenetic test for patients with DD/ID, MCA or ASD. A total of 1191 patients were analyzed, including postnatal (1072 [90%] patients and 59 [5%] family members) and prenatal referrals (60 [5%] fetuses). Abnormal results were reported in 298 (25%) patients, with a total of 351 findings (1-3 per individual): 147 (42%) deletions, 106 (30%) duplications, 89 (25%) long contiguous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH) events (>5 Mb), and nine (3%) aneuploidies. Of all findings, 143 (41%) were defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic; for another 143 findings (41%), most of which were LCSH, the clinical significance remained unknown, while 61 (18%) reported findings can now be reclassified as benign or likely benign. Clinically relevant findings were detected in 126 (11%) patients. However, the proportion of variants of unknown clinical significance was quite high (41% of all findings). It seems that our ability to detect chromosomal abnormalities has far outpaced our ability to understand their role in disease. Thus, the interpretation of CMA findings remains a rather difficult task requiring a close collaboration between clinicians and cytogeneticists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Psychology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
#712
of 1,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,503
of 318,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.