↓ Skip to main content

Utilization of a Free Fitness Center-Based Exercise Referral Program Among Women with Chronic Disease Risk Factors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Utilization of a Free Fitness Center-Based Exercise Referral Program Among Women with Chronic Disease Risk Factors
Published in
Journal of Community Health, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10900-014-9874-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan R. Waterman, John M. Wiecha, Jennifer Manne, Stephen M. Tringale, Elizabeth Costa, Jean L. Wiecha

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) reduces the risk for a number of chronic diseases including heart disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus type 2. However, most Americans do not meet expert recommendations for exercise, and minorities and low-income persons are the most inactive. Community-based approaches to promoting PA include primary care exercise referral programs. This study examines patient characteristics associated with utilization of a community health center-based exercise referral program. Adult female patients of a community health center with an affiliated fitness center, in Boston, MA, were included in the study if they received a referral to the fitness center from their primary care provider. Demographic and medical information was abstracted from the medical chart, and fitness records were abstracted to measure activation of a fitness center membership (creation of an account denoting at least an initial visit) and utilization over time. Overall, 503 (40 %) of the 1,254 referred women in the study sample activated their membership. Black women were almost 60 % more likely to activate their membership (adjusted OR 1.6, 95 % CI 1.2-2.2), and women with higher co-morbidity counts were almost 45 % more likely to activate (adjusted OR 1.4, 95 % CI 1.0-2.0). Once activated, a minority of women participated at levels likely to improve cardiometabolic fitness. Of the 503 activations, 96 (19 %) had no participation, 359 (71 %) had low participation, and only 48 (10 %) had high participation. No independent predictors of participation were identified. These findings suggest that program design may benefit from developing activation, initial participation, and retention strategies that address population-specific barriers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 20%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Psychology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,255,226
of 24,569,575 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#76
of 1,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,344
of 231,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,569,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.