| Title |
Home Telehealth Uptake and Continued Use Among Heart Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: a Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-014-9607-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah L. Gorst, Christopher J. Armitage, Simon Brownsell, Mark S. Hawley |
| Abstract |
Home telehealth has the potential to benefit heart failure (HF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, however large-scale deployment is yet to be achieved. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 50% |
| United States | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 213 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 9% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 45 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,587,362
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#191
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,057
of 226,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.