↓ Skip to main content

Genetic and environmental influences on aspects of literacy and language in early childhood: Continuity and change from preschool to Grade 2

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurolinguistics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic and environmental influences on aspects of literacy and language in early childhood: Continuity and change from preschool to Grade 2
Published in
Journal of Neurolinguistics, May 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2008.09.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Byrne, William L. Coventry, Richard K. Olson, Stefan Samuelsson, Robin Corley, Erik G. Willcutt, Sally Wadsworth, John C. DeFries

Abstract

Early literacy and language skills of twin children in the USA, Australia, and Scandinavia were explored in a genetically sensitive design (maximum N = 615 pairs). For this article, we report aspects of preschool and Grade 2 data. In Grade 2, there were strong genetic influences on word reading, reading comprehension, and spelling. Vocabulary was about equally affected by genes and shared environment. Multivariate analyses indicated substantial genetic overlap among the Grade 2 literacy variables. Longitudinal analyses showed that genetic factors evident at the preschool stage continued to affect literacy and vocabulary three years later in Grade 2, but there was also evidence of new genetic factors coming into play over the time interval, at least for literacy. Suggestions are made about the search for underlying biological and cognitive processes, and educational implications are explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 14%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Professor 8 7%
Other 29 24%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 33%
Social Sciences 16 13%
Linguistics 8 7%
Arts and Humanities 6 5%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 29 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurolinguistics
#182
of 283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,602
of 104,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurolinguistics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them