| Title |
The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10606-014-9202-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rob Procter, Trisha Greenhalgh, Joe Wherton, Paul Sugarhood, Mark Rouncefield, Sue Hinder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 49% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 67% |
| Scientists | 8 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 22% |
| Researcher | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 36 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 35 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 9% |
| Psychology | 12 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,508,208
of 25,722,279 outputs
Outputs from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#10
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,496
of 242,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,722,279 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them