↓ Skip to main content

A Developmental Pathway From Early Life Stress to Inflammation

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
11 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Developmental Pathway From Early Life Stress to Inflammation
Published in
Psychological Science, April 2014
DOI 10.1177/0956797614530570
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth B. Raposa, Julienne E. Bower, Constance L. Hammen, Jake M. Najman, Patricia A. Brennan

Abstract

Early life stressors are associated with elevated inflammation, a key physiological risk factor for disease. However, the mechanisms by which early stress leads to inflammation remain largely unknown. Using a longitudinal data set, we examined smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index (BMI) as health-behavior pathways by which early adversity might lead to inflammation during young adulthood. Contemporaneously measured early adversity predicted increased BMI and smoking but not alcohol consumption, and these effects were partially accounted for by chronic stress in young adulthood. Higher BMI in turn predicted higher levels of soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor type II (sTNF-RII) and C-reactive protein (CRP), and smoking predicted elevated sTNF-RII. These findings establish that early adversity contributes to inflammation in part through ongoing stress and maladaptive health behavior. Given that maladaptive health behaviors portend inflammation in young adulthood, they serve as promising targets for interventions designed to prevent the negative consequences of early adversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 139 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,042,382
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#1,743
of 4,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,101
of 227,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#34
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 80.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.