| Title |
Archeological evidence for selection in avocado
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, April 1966
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02904012 |
| Authors |
C. Earle Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 29% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,687,175
of 25,032,929 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#129
of 889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157
of 1,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,032,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them