↓ Skip to main content

A safety mechanism for observational learning

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
A safety mechanism for observational learning
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, July 2017
DOI 10.3758/s13423-017-1355-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arnaud Badets, Arnaud Boutin, Thomas Michelet

Abstract

This empirical article presents the first evidence of a "safety mechanism" based on an observational-learning paradigm. It is accepted that during observational learning, a person can use different strategies to learn a motor skill, but it is unknown whether the learner is able to circumvent the encoding of an uncompleted observed skill. In this study, participants were tested in a dyadic protocol in which an observer watched a participant practicing two different motor sequences during a learning phase. During this phase, one of the two motor sequences was interrupted by a stop signal that precluded motor learning. The results of the subsequent retention test revealed that both groups learned the two motor sequences, but only the physical practice group showed worse performance for the interrupted sequence. The observers were consequently able to use a safety strategy to learn both sequences equally. Our findings are discussed in light of the implications of the action observation network for sequence learning and the cognitive mechanisms of error-based observation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 32%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 23%
Sports and Recreations 5 23%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%