| Title |
Benefits and risks of success or failure of noninvasive ventilation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-006-0324-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandre Demoule, Emmanuelle Girou, Jean-Christophe Richard, Solenne Taille, Laurent Brochard |
| Abstract |
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) fails more frequently for de novo acute respiratory failure (de novo) than for cardiogenic pulmonary edema (CPE) or acute-on-chronic respiratory failure (AOC). The impact of NIV failure and success was compared between de novo and CPE or AOC after adjustment for disease severity. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 14% |
| Other | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 23% |
| Unknown | 46 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 129 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 55 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2009.
All research outputs
#6,373,258
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,612
of 4,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,822
of 67,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.