| Title |
Regarding your article “Baseline time accounting: considering global land use dynamics when estimating the climate impact of indirect land use change caused by biofuels.” Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(2):319–330. doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0488-6
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-013-0562-8 |
| Authors |
Jeremy I. Martin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 47% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 33% |
| Energy | 2 | 13% |
| Engineering | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,092,648
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#343
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,621
of 196,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.