↓ Skip to main content

Normalizing Metabolism in Diabetic Pregnancy: Is It Time to Target Lipids?

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Care, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Normalizing Metabolism in Diabetic Pregnancy: Is It Time to Target Lipids?
Published in
Diabetes Care, April 2014
DOI 10.2337/dc13-1934
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen L. Barrett, Marloes Dekker Nitert, H. David McIntyre, Leonie K. Callaway

Abstract

Outcomes in pregnancies complicated by preexisting diabetes (type 1 and type 2) and gestational diabetes mellitus have improved, but there is still excess morbidity compared with normal pregnancy. Management strategies appropriately focus on maternal glycemia, which demonstrably improves pregnancy outcomes for mother and infant. However, we may be reaching the boundaries of obtainable glycemic control for many women. It has been acknowledged that maternal lipids are important in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Elevated maternal lipids are associated with preeclampsia, preterm delivery, and large-for-gestational-age infants. Despite this understanding, assessment of management strategies targeting maternal lipids has been neglected to date. Consideration needs to be given to whether normalizing maternal lipids would further improve pregnancy outcomes. This review examines the dyslipidemia associated with pregnancy complicated by diabetes, reviews possible therapies, and considers whether it is time to start actively managing this aspect of maternal metabolism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,503,514
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Care
#8,282
of 10,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,515
of 242,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Care
#87
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.