You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
若手の会だより
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Seibutsu Butsuri, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2142/biophys.57.222 |
| Authors |
西川 秀明 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 25% |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,042,876
of 25,516,314 outputs
Outputs from Seibutsu Butsuri
#13
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,289
of 422,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seibutsu Butsuri
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,516,314 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.