↓ Skip to main content

The Axolotl Limb Regeneration Model as a Discovery Tool for Engineering the Stem Cell Niche

Overview of attention for article published in Current Stem Cell Reports, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
The Axolotl Limb Regeneration Model as a Discovery Tool for Engineering the Stem Cell Niche
Published in
Current Stem Cell Reports, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40778-017-0085-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Negar Seyedhassantehrani, Takayoshi Otsuka, Shambhavi Singh, David M. Gardiner

Abstract

Recent advances in genomics and gene editing have expanded the range of model organisms to include those with interesting biological capabilities such as regeneration. Among these are the classic models of regeneration biology, the salamander. Although stimulating endogenous regeneration in humans likely is many years away, with advances in stem cell biology and biomedical engineering (e.g. bio-inspired materials), it is evident that there is great potential to enhance regenerative outcomes by approaching the problem from an engineering perspective. The question at this point is what do we need to engineer? The value of regeneration models is that they show us how regeneration works, which then can guide efforts to mimic these developmental processes therapeutically. Among these models, the Accessory Limb Model (ALM) was developed in the axolotl as a gain-of-function assay for the sequential steps that are required for successful regeneration. To date, this model has identified a number of proregenerative signals, including growth factor signaling associated with nerves, and signals associated with the extracellular matrix (ECM) that induce pattern formation. Identification of these signals through the use of models in highly regenerative vertebrates (e.g. the axolotl) offers a wide range of possible modifications for engineering bio-inspired, biomimetic materials to create a dynamic stem cell niche for regeneration and scar-free repair.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2017.
All research outputs
#19,011,832
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Current Stem Cell Reports
#15
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,477
of 318,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Stem Cell Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them