You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Midwives׳ experiences of workplace resilience
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Midwifery, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Billie Hunter, Lucie Warren |
| Abstract |
many UK midwives experience workplace adversity resulting from a national shortage of midwives, rise in birth rate and increased numbers of women entering pregnancy with complex care needs. Research evidence suggests that workplace pressures, and the emotional demands of the job, may increase midwives׳ experience of stress and contribute to low morale, sickness and attrition. Much less is known about midwives who demonstrate resilience in the face of adversity. Resilience has been investigated in studies of other health and social care workers, but there is a gap in knowledge regarding midwives׳ experiences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 45% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 288 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 8% |
| Researcher | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 69 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 29% |
| Psychology | 40 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 79 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,292,414
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Midwifery
#287
of 2,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,556
of 238,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Midwifery
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.