| Title |
Getting serious about test–retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Quality of Life Research, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11136-014-0632-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denise F. Polit |
| Abstract |
To focus attention on the need for rigorous and carefully designed test-retest reliability assessments for new patient-reported outcomes and to encourage retest researchers to be thoughtful, ambitious, and creative in their retest efforts. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 287 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 13% |
| Researcher | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 90 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 55 | 19% |
| Unknown | 100 | 35% |