↓ Skip to main content

Systemic lupus erythematosus: a genetic epidemiology study of 695 patients from China

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Dermatological Research, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Systemic lupus erythematosus: a genetic epidemiology study of 695 patients from China
Published in
Archives of Dermatological Research, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00403-006-0719-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Wang, S. Yang, J. J. Chen, S. M. Zhou, S. M. He, Y. H. Liang, W. Meng, X. F. Yan, J. J. Liu, D. Q. Ye, X. J. Zhang

Abstract

Our purpose was to explore potential genetic models for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and analyze genetic epidemiologic characteristics of SLE in a Chinese population. Data for 695 patients with SLE were obtained by using a uniform questionnaire. Patients, clinical characteristics and their family history were analyzed using software. A complex segregation analysis was conducted to propose potential genetic models for SLE. The mean +/- SD age of onset were 30.2 +/- 10.5 years and mean time to progression to SLE was 32.5 +/- 44.4 months. The most frequent initial manifestations were malar rash (61.3%). During the evolution of the disease, the main clinical features were arthritis in 73.6% of our patients, followed by malar rash (68.1%), and renal involvement (56.7%). As the first symptom, the late-onset group (onset of disease beyond the age of 50 years) less often showed malar rash (45% vs. 63.4% in the early-onset group; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the other cumulative clinical symptoms between late-onset and early-onset group, except for a lower prevalence of malar rash, photosensitivity and alopecia and a higher prevalence of mucosal ulcers in the late-onset group. A positive family history of SLE was obtained in 50 patients (7.2%). There were no statistical differences in clinical characteristics between familial SLE and sporadic SLE patients. The heritability of SLE was 43.6%, the genetic model of SLE could be polygenetic model and major gene mode is the best fitted one. SLE could be a multifactorial disease with polygenetic model.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Singapore 1 3%
Unknown 30 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 35%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2007.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Dermatological Research
#953
of 1,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,697
of 154,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Dermatological Research
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,313 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.