| Title |
After pension reform: Navigating the “Third Rail” in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Studies in Comparative International Development, June 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02686277 |
| Authors |
Mark W. Frazier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 60% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2014.
All research outputs
#5,872,167
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Studies in Comparative International Development
#122
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,020
of 57,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studies in Comparative International Development
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them