↓ Skip to main content

Stent Retrievers in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Complications and Failures during the Perioperative Period

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stent Retrievers in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Complications and Failures during the Perioperative Period
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, October 2013
DOI 10.3174/ajnr.a3746
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Gascou, K. Lobotesis, P. Machi, I. Maldonado, J.F. Vendrell, C. Riquelme, O. Eker, G. Mercier, I. Mourand, C. Arquizan, A. Bonafé, V. Costalat

Abstract

Stent retriever-assisted thrombectomy promotes high recanalization rates in acute ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, complications and failures occur in more than 10% of procedures; hence, there is a need for further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 140 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 15%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 48%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Engineering 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Chemical Engineering 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,972,869
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#947
of 4,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,417
of 212,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#4
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.