You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.130925 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ekaterina Mishanina, Ewelina Rogozinska, Tej Thatthi, Rehan Uddin-Khan, Khalid S Khan, Catherine Meads |
| Abstract |
Induction of labour is common, and cesarean delivery is regarded as its major complication. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate whether the risk of cesarean delivery is higher or lower following labour induction compared with expectant management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 36% |
| Canada | 10 | 16% |
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 64% |
| Scientists | 10 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 14% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 55 | 21% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Unknown | 72 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#400,564
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#698
of 9,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,357
of 246,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#8
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.