You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep transcriptome profiling of mammalian stem cells supports a regulatory role for retrotransposons in pluripotency maintenance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.2965 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexandre Fort, Kosuke Hashimoto, Daisuke Yamada, Md Salimullah, Chaman A Keya, Alka Saxena, Alessandro Bonetti, Irina Voineagu, Nicolas Bertin, Anton Kratz, Yukihiko Noro, Chee-Hong Wong, Michiel de Hoon, Robin Andersson, Albin Sandelin, Harukazu Suzuki, Chia-Lin Wei, Haruhiko Koseki, Yuki Hasegawa, Alistair R R Forrest, Piero Carninci |
| Abstract |
The importance of microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs in the regulation of pluripotency has been documented; however, the noncoding components of stem cell gene networks remain largely unknown. Here we investigate the role of noncoding RNAs in the pluripotent state, with particular emphasis on nuclear and retrotransposon-derived transcripts. We have performed deep profiling of the nuclear and cytoplasmic transcriptomes of human and mouse stem cells, identifying a class of previously undetected stem cell-specific transcripts. We show that long terminal repeat (LTR)-derived transcripts contribute extensively to the complexity of the stem cell nuclear transcriptome. Some LTR-derived transcripts are associated with enhancer regions and are likely to be involved in the maintenance of pluripotency. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 14% |
| France | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 9 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 533 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 497 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 149 | 28% |
| Researcher | 124 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 31 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 82 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 257 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 150 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Unknown | 67 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#613,366
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,208
of 7,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,456
of 246,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#17
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.