↓ Skip to main content

Impaired oral fatty acid chemoreception is associated with acute excess energy consumption

Overview of attention for article published in Appetite, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impaired oral fatty acid chemoreception is associated with acute excess energy consumption
Published in
Appetite, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Russell S.J. Keast, Kaylee M. Azzopardi, Lisa P. Newman, Rivkeh Y. Haryono

Abstract

Excessive consumption of dietary fat is implicated with development of obesity. Impaired oral and gastrointestinal chemoreception to the breakdown products of dietary fat, fatty acids, may be associated with increased energy consumption. The objective of this study was to determine if impaired oral fatty acid chemoreception influences energy intake and perceived satiety. Subjects (n = 24) attended six laboratory sessions. Impaired fatty acid chemoreception was defined as subjects who could not identify >3.8 mM oleic acid (C18:1). Subjects participated in a blinded crossover study and consumed each of three high macronutrient breakfasts (high fat, high protein, high carbohydrate) and a balanced macronutrient breakfast on four separate days. Following breakfast, subjects were required to consume a buffet-style lunch until comfortably full. The amount consumed (MJ and g) was measured, as was perceived satiety prior to and following meals. Following the high fat breakfast, subjects with impaired fatty acid chemoreception (n = 10) consumed significantly more energy (2.1 ± 0.8 MJ) and grams (237.70 ± 46.37 g) of food at lunch compared to other subjects (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in energy, grams of food consumed at lunch and perceived satiety, between subjects for the other breakfasts (P > 0.05). Impaired oral fatty acid chemoreception was associated with excess energy consumption following a high fat meal.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 9 11%
Professor 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2019.
All research outputs
#231,336
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Appetite
#136
of 4,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,826
of 242,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Appetite
#5
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.