↓ Skip to main content

Different Kinds of Near-Death Experience: A Report on a Survey of Near-Death Experiences in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Near-Death Studies, September 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Different Kinds of Near-Death Experience: A Report on a Survey of Near-Death Experiences in Germany
Published in
Journal of Near-Death Studies, September 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1011112727078
Authors

Hubert Knoblauch, Ina Schmied, Bernt Schnettler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 33%
Other 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 33%
Psychology 3 25%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,002,215
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Near-Death Studies
#1
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#623
of 40,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Near-Death Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one scored the same or higher as 39 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them