| Title |
Exercise volume and intensity: a dose–response relationship with health benefits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-014-2887-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather J. A. Foulds, Shannon S. D. Bredin, Sarah A. Charlesworth, Adam C. Ivey, Darren E. R. Warburton |
| Abstract |
The health benefits of exercise are well established. However, the relationship between exercise volume and intensity and health benefits remains unclear, particularly the benefits of low-volume and intensity exercise. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 25% |
| United States | 5 | 18% |
| Australia | 3 | 11% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Norway | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 23% |
| Unknown | 39 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 57 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 16% |
| Psychology | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,296,706
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#764
of 4,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,666
of 241,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#16
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.