↓ Skip to main content

Assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution allows differentiation of hydrostatic pulmonary edema from ALI/ARDS

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution allows differentiation of hydrostatic pulmonary edema from ALI/ARDS
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00134-006-0498-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier Monnet, Nadia Anguel, David Osman, Olfa Hamzaoui, Christian Richard, Jean-Louis Teboul

Abstract

To test whether assessing pulmonary permeability by transpulmonary thermodilution enables to differentiate increased permeability pulmonary edema (ALI/ARDS) from hydrostatic pulmonary edema.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 3%
France 2 2%
Switzerland 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 89 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 26%
Other 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Student > Master 7 7%
Professor 6 6%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 70%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,103,871
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,541
of 4,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,724
of 158,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#11
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.