↓ Skip to main content

Modulation of peanut-induced allergic immune responses by oral lactic acid bacteria-based vaccines in mice

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Modulation of peanut-induced allergic immune responses by oral lactic acid bacteria-based vaccines in mice
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00253-014-5678-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chengcheng Ren, Qiuxiang Zhang, Gang Wang, Chunqing Ai, Mengsha Hu, Xiaoming Liu, Fengwei Tian, Jianxin Zhao, Yongquan Chen, Miao Wang, Hao Zhang, Wei Chen

Abstract

Peanut allergy (PNA) has becoming a non-negligible health concern worldwide. Thus far, allergen-specific immunotherapy aimed at inducing mucosal tolerance has widely been regarded as a major management strategy for PNA. The safety profiles and the intrinsic probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) render them attractive delivery vehicles for mucosal vaccines. In the present study, we exploited genetically modified Lactococcus lactis to produce peanut allergen Ara h 2 via different protein-targeting systems and their immunomodulatory potency for allergic immune responses in mice were investigated. By comparison with the strain expressing the cytoplasmic form of Ara h 2 (LL1), the strains expressing the secreted and anchored forms of Ara h 2 (LL2 and LL3) were more potent in redirecting a Th2-polarized to a non-allergic Th1 immune responses. Induction of SIgA and regulatory T cells were also observed at the local levels by orally administration of recombinant L. lactis. Our results indicate that allergen-producing L. lactis strains modulated allergic immune responses and may be developed as promising mucosal vaccines for managing allergic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,105,592
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#5,242
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,890
of 230,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#56
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.