↓ Skip to main content

Implicit trust in clinical decision-making by multidisciplinary teams

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Implicit trust in clinical decision-making by multidisciplinary teams
Published in
Synthese, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11229-017-1475-z
Authors

Sophie van Baalen, Annamaria Carusi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 10%
Computer Science 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,473,755
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,530
of 2,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,584
of 315,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#30
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.