You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Flows for native fish in the Murray‐Darling Basin: lessons and considerations for future management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Management & Restoration, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/emr.12091 |
| Authors |
John D. Koehn, Alison J. King, Leah Beesley, Craig Copeland, Brenton P. Zampatti, Martin Mallen‐Cooper |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 25% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,757,111
of 24,716,872 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Management & Restoration
#90
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,195
of 232,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Management & Restoration
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,716,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.