↓ Skip to main content

Gender and Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual Moderators

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
34 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
411 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1029 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender and Perceptions of Leadership Effectiveness: A Meta-Analysis of Contextual Moderators
Published in
Journal of Applied Psychology, November 2014
DOI 10.1037/a0036751
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha C. Paustian-Underdahl, Lisa Slattery Walker, David J. Woehr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,029 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
Germany 4 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1000 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 206 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 205 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 125 12%
Student > Bachelor 102 10%
Researcher 54 5%
Other 161 16%
Unknown 176 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 293 28%
Psychology 267 26%
Social Sciences 129 13%
Arts and Humanities 31 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 25 2%
Other 88 9%
Unknown 196 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#242,203
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#89
of 3,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,327
of 275,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.