↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of coincident GRACE and ICESat data over Antarctica

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geodesy, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A comparison of coincident GRACE and ICESat data over Antarctica
Published in
Journal of Geodesy, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00190-009-0323-4
Authors

Brian Gunter, T. Urban, R. Riva, M. Helsen, R. Harpold, S. Poole, P. Nagel, B. Schutz, B. Tapley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Svalbard and Jan Mayen 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 64 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 39 57%
Environmental Science 8 12%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2014.
All research outputs
#6,405,163
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geodesy
#72
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,172
of 111,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geodesy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them