↓ Skip to main content

The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: measuring the cosmic expansion history using the Alcock–Paczynski test and distant supernovae

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: measuring the cosmic expansion history using the Alcock–Paczynski test and distant supernovae
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, October 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19606.x
Authors

Chris Blake, Karl Glazebrook, Tamara M. Davis, Sarah Brough, Matthew Colless, Carlos Contreras, Warrick Couch, Scott Croom, Michael J. Drinkwater, Karl Forster, David Gilbank, Mike Gladders, Ben Jelliffe, Russell J. Jurek, I‐hui Li, Barry Madore, D. Christopher Martin, Kevin Pimbblet, Gregory B. Poole, Michael Pracy, Rob Sharp, Emily Wisnioski, David Woods, Ted K. Wyder, H. K. C. Yee

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 5%
Denmark 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 34%
Researcher 14 32%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 42 95%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#32,509
of 39,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,874
of 144,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#167
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.