↓ Skip to main content

A new physically based stochastic event catalog for hail in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
A new physically based stochastic event catalog for hail in Europe
Published in
Natural Hazards, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1161-0
Authors

H. J. Punge, K. M. Bedka, M. Kunz, A. Werner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 33%
Environmental Science 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Engineering 7 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,330,665
of 24,593,959 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#598
of 1,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,278
of 232,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.