↓ Skip to main content

The nature of altered vision near the hands: Evidence for the magnocellular enhancement account from object correspondence through occlusion

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
The nature of altered vision near the hands: Evidence for the magnocellular enhancement account from object correspondence through occlusion
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, March 2014
DOI 10.3758/s13423-014-0622-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie C. Goodhew, Nicole Fogel, Jay Pratt

Abstract

A growing body of evidence indicates that the perception of visual stimuli is altered when they occur near the observer's hands, relative to other locations in space (see Brockmole, Davoli, Abrams, & Witt, 2013, for a review). Several accounts have been offered to explain the pattern of performance across different tasks. These have typically focused on attentional explanations (attentional prioritization and detailed attentional evaluation of stimuli in near-hand space), but more recently, it has been suggested that near-hand space enjoys enhanced magnocellular (M) input. Here we differentiate between the attentional and M-cell accounts, via a task that probes the roles of position consistency and color consistency in determining dynamic object correspondence through occlusion. We found that placing the hands near the visual display made observers use only position consistency, and not color, in determining object correspondence through occlusion, which is consistent with the fact that M cells are relatively insensitive to color. In contrast, placing observers' hands far from the stimuli allowed both color and position contribute. This provides evidence in favor of the M-cell enhancement account of altered vision near the hands.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 40 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 32%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 50%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 20%