↓ Skip to main content

Early aberrant DNA methylation events in a mouse model of acute myeloid leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Early aberrant DNA methylation events in a mouse model of acute myeloid leukemia
Published in
Genome Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/gm551
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Aberrant DNA methylation is frequently found in human malignancies including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While most studies focus on later disease stages, the onset of aberrant DNA methylation events and their dynamics during leukemic progression are largely unknown.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
South Africa 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Computer Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,917,020
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#927
of 1,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,692
of 247,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.