↓ Skip to main content

Dietary vitamin D2 – a potentially underestimated contributor to vitamin D nutritional status of adults?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Nutrition, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary vitamin D2 – a potentially underestimated contributor to vitamin D nutritional status of adults?
Published in
British Journal of Nutrition, April 2014
DOI 10.1017/s0007114514000725
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin D. Cashman, Michael Kinsella, Breige A. McNulty, Janette Walton, Michael J. Gibney, Albert Flynn, Mairead Kiely

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 4 7%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2014.
All research outputs
#15,184,741
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Nutrition
#4,457
of 6,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,649
of 242,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Nutrition
#47
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.