| Title |
Brain lesions in septic shock: a magnetic resonance imaging study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-007-0598-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tarek Sharshar, Robert Carlier, Francis Bernard, Céline Guidoux, Jean-Philippe Brouland, Olivier Nardi, Geoffroy Lorin de la Grandmaison, Jérôme Aboab, Françoise Gray, David Menon, Djillali Annane |
| Abstract |
Understanding of sepsis-induced brain dysfunction remains poor, and relies mainly on data from animals or post-mortem studies in patients. The current study provided findings from magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in septic shock. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 19% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 25% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 49% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2007.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#4,611
of 5,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,841
of 95,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#35
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.