| Title |
Ranging characteristics of the domestic cat (Felis catus) in an urban environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Urban Ecosystems, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11252-014-0360-5 |
| Authors |
Rebecca L. Thomas, Philip J. Baker, Mark D. E. Fellowes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 35 | 34% |
| Australia | 5 | 5% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Comoros | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 53 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 80% |
| Scientists | 17 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 230 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 60 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 32% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 31 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2021.
All research outputs
#591,180
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Urban Ecosystems
#18
of 841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,215
of 242,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Ecosystems
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.