↓ Skip to main content

Do Normal Radiographs Exclude Asphericity of the Femoral Head‐Neck Junction?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Do Normal Radiographs Exclude Asphericity of the Femoral Head‐Neck Junction?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, November 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0617-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Dudda, Christoph Albers, Tallal Charles Mamisch, Stefan Werlen, Martin Beck

Abstract

Asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction is one cause for femoroacetabular impingement of the hip. However, the asphericity often is underestimated on conventional radiographs. This study compares the presence of asphericity on conventional radiographs with its appearance on radial slices of magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). We retrospectively reviewed 58 selected hips in 148 patients who underwent a surgical dislocation of the hip. To assess the circumference of the proximal femur, alpha angle and height of asphericity were measured in 14 positions using radial slices of MRA. The hips were assigned to one of four groups depending on the appearance of the head-neck junction on anteroposterior pelvic and lateral crosstable radiographs. Group I (n = 19) was circular on both planes, Group II (n = 19) was aspheric on the crosstable view, Group III (n = 4) was aspheric on the anteroposterior view, and Group IV (n = 13) was aspheric on both views. In all four groups, the highest alpha angle was found in the anterosuperior area of the head-neck junction. Even when conventional radiographs appeared normal, an increased alpha angle was present anterosuperiorly. Without the use of radial slices in MRA, the asphericity would be underestimated in these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
Brazil 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 94 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 31 30%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 61%
Engineering 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,262,981
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,336
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,070
of 180,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#29
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.