↓ Skip to main content

Greater Sensitivity to Drought Accompanies Maize Yield Increase in the U.S. Midwest

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
810 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
856 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Greater Sensitivity to Drought Accompanies Maize Yield Increase in the U.S. Midwest
Published in
Science, May 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1251423
Pubmed ID
Authors

David B. Lobell, Michael J. Roberts, Wolfram Schlenker, Noah Braun, Bertis B. Little, Roderick M. Rejesus, Graeme L. Hammer

Abstract

A key question for climate change adaptation is whether existing cropping systems can become less sensitive to climate variations. We use a field-level data set on maize and soybean yields in the central United States for 1995 through 2012 to examine changes in drought sensitivity. Although yields have increased in absolute value under all levels of stress for both crops, the sensitivity of maize yields to drought stress associated with high vapor pressure deficits has increased. The greater sensitivity has occurred despite cultivar improvements and increased carbon dioxide and reflects the agronomic trend toward higher sowing densities. The results suggest that agronomic changes tend to translate improved drought tolerance of plants to higher average yields but not to decreasing drought sensitivity of yields at the field scale.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 856 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
Germany 5 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 827 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 208 24%
Researcher 145 17%
Student > Master 109 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 6%
Professor 43 5%
Other 142 17%
Unknown 156 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 298 35%
Environmental Science 99 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 76 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 49 6%
Engineering 29 3%
Other 99 12%
Unknown 206 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 225. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#172,848
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,113
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,334
of 246,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#53
of 889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.