↓ Skip to main content

“Fishing” for the Origins of the “Eskimos and Heart Disease” Story: Facts or Wishful Thinking?

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Cardiology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 2,628)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Fishing” for the Origins of the “Eskimos and Heart Disease” Story: Facts or Wishful Thinking?
Published in
Canadian Journal of Cardiology, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.04.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. George Fodor, Eftyhia Helis, Narges Yazdekhasti, Branislav Vohnout

Abstract

During the 1970s, 2 Danish investigators, Bang and Dyerberg, on being informed that the Greenland Eskimos had a low prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) set out to study the diet of this population. Bang and Dyerberg described the "Eskimo diet" as consisting of large amounts of seal and whale blubber (ie, fats of animal origin) and suggested that this diet was a key factor in the alleged low incidence of CAD. This was the beginning of a proliferation of studies that focused on the cardioprotective effects of the "Eskimo diet." In view of data, which accumulated on this topic during the past 40 years, we conducted a review of published literature to examine whether mortality and morbidity due to CAD are indeed lower in Eskimo/Inuit populations compared with their Caucasian counterparts. Most studies found that the Greenland Eskimos and the Canadian and Alaskan Inuit have CAD as often as the non-Eskimo populations. Notably, Bang and Dyerberg's studies from the 1970s did not investigate the prevalence of CAD in this population; however, their reports are still routinely cited as evidence for the cardioprotective effect of the "Eskimo diet." We discuss the possible motives leading to the misinterpretation of these seminal studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 160 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 17%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Other 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 30 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Chemistry 7 4%
Other 32 19%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 162. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#257,325
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Cardiology
#49
of 2,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,048
of 241,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Cardiology
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.