↓ Skip to main content

Type I IFN signaling in CD8– DCs impairs Th1-dependent malaria immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Type I IFN signaling in CD8– DCs impairs Th1-dependent malaria immunity
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, May 2014
DOI 10.1172/jci70698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashraful Haque, Shannon E. Best, Marcela Montes de Oca, Kylie R. James, Anne Ammerdorffer, Chelsea L. Edwards, Fabian de Labastida Rivera, Fiona H. Amante, Patrick T. Bunn, Meru Sheel, Ismail Sebina, Motoko Koyama, Antiopi Varelias, Paul J. Hertzog, Ulrich Kalinke, Sin Yee Gun, Laurent Rénia, Christiane Ruedl, Kelli P.A. MacDonald, Geoffrey R. Hill, Christian R. Engwerda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 26%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,138,651
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#4,087
of 17,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,376
of 242,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#111
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.