You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases in Burundi: Partnerships, Achievements, Challenges, and Lessons Learned after Four Years of Programme Implementation
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002684 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Onésime Ndayishimiye, Giuseppina Ortu, Ricardo J. Soares Magalhaes, Archie Clements, Johan Willems, Jane Whitton, Warren Lancaster, Adrian Hopkins, Alan Fenwick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 32% |
Georgia | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Senegal | 1 | 5% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 5% |
Vietnam | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 84% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,126,644
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#651
of 9,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,812
of 242,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#11
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.