↓ Skip to main content

Risk of breast cancer after stopping menopausal hormone therapy in the E3N cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Risk of breast cancer after stopping menopausal hormone therapy in the E3N cohort
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10549-014-2934-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agnès Fournier, Sylvie Mesrine, Laure Dossus, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Nathalie Chabbert-Buffet

Abstract

Questions remain on how the excess risk of breast cancer associated with menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) evolves after treatment stops. We investigated that issue in the E3N cohort, with 3,678 invasive breast cancers identified between 1992 and 2008 among 78,353 women (881,290 person-years of postmenopausal follow-up). Exposure to MHT was assessed through biennial self-administered questionnaires and classified by type of progestagen component (progesterone or dydrogesterone; other progestagen), duration (short-term ≤5 years; long-term >5 years) and time since last use (current, 3 months-5 years, 5-10 years, 10+ years). Hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals (CI) were estimated with Cox models. Among short-term users, only those currently using estrogens associated with a progestagen other than progesterone/dydrogesterone had a significantly elevated breast cancer risk (HR 1.70, 95 % CI 1.50-1.91, compared with never users). Long-term use of this type of MHT was associated with a HR of 2.02 (1.81-2.26) when current and of 1.36 (1.13-1.64), 1.34 (1.04-1.73), and 1.52 (0.87-2.63) when stopped ≤5, 5-10, and 10+ years earlier, respectively. Our results suggest residual increases in breast cancer risk several years after MHT cessation, which are restricted to long-term treatments. Whether increases persist more than 10 years after cessation deserves continuing investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Other 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Mathematics 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#599,429
of 24,777,509 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#55
of 4,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,484
of 232,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#2
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,777,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.