| Title |
EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-014-3431-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karl Hermann Fuchs, Benjamin Babic, Wolfram Breithaupt, Bernard Dallemagne, Abe Fingerhut, Edgar Furnee, Frank Granderath, Peter Horvath, Peter Kardos, Rudolph Pointner, Edoardo Savarino, Maud Van Herwaarden-Lindeboom, Giovanni Zaninotto |
| Abstract |
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most frequent benign disorders of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Management of GERD has always been controversial since modern medical therapy is very effective, but laparoscopic fundoplication is one of the few procedures that were quickly adapted to the minimal access technique. The purpose of this project was to analyze the current knowledge on GERD in regard to its pathophysiology, diagnostic assessment, medical therapy, and surgical therapy, and special circumstances such as GERD in children, Barrett's esophagus, and enteroesophageal and duodenogastroesophageal reflux. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 30% |
| Congo | 1 | 10% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| Turkey | 1 | 10% |
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 223 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 16% |
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 57 | 26% |
| Unknown | 41 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 54% |
| Unspecified | 11 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2020.
All research outputs
#992,166
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#63
of 6,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,597
of 227,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#1
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.