↓ Skip to main content

Posterior thoracic osteotomies

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Posterior thoracic osteotomies
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00590-014-1463-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ferran Pellisé, Alba Vila-Casademunt, European Spine Study Group (ESSG)

Abstract

Spinal osteotomies are used to treat partially flexible and fixed deformities. Fixed thoracic spinal deformities have been traditionally treated with anterior release and posterior correction with fusion. In recent decades, it has been shown that posterior-only osteotomies might be sufficient to achieve proper deformity correction with lower complication rates than with combined anterior and posterior procedures. Different types of osteotomies have been described to treat spinal deformities through a single posterior approach. These include posterior column osteotomies such as the Smith-Petersen osteotomy and the Ponte osteotomy, and three-column osteotomies such as the pedicle subtraction osteotomy, the posterior vertebral column resection and the posterior vertebral column decancellation. In general, three-column osteotomies are most commonly performed in the lumbar spine, where the vast majority of reports have focused on. They can also be performed in the thoracic spine in the setting of rigid thoracic deformity. A progressive increase in complications has been reported with more aggressive osteotomies. The aim of this article was to describe the most common posterior spinal osteotomies used to treat adult thoracic spinal deformities, with special emphasis on the technical aspects, complications and outcomes, based on current publications and European Spine Study Group (ESSG) data.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 26%
Researcher 4 21%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 5 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 63%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Design 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%