↓ Skip to main content

Medications and Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Safety, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Medications and Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency
Published in
Drug Safety, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/11536520-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilan Youngster, Lidia Arcavi, Renata Schechmaster, Yulia Akayzen, Hen Popliski, Janna Shimonov, Svetlana Beig, Matitiahu Berkovitch

Abstract

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common human enzyme defect and one of the most common genetic disorders worldwide, with an estimated 400 million people worldwide carrying a mutation in the G6PD gene that causes deficiency of the enzyme. Although drug-induced haemolysis is considered the most common adverse clinical consequence of G6PD deficiency, significant confusion exists regarding which drugs can cause haemolytic anaemia in patients with G6PD deficiency. In the absence of consensus among physicians, patients are subject to conflicting advice, causing uncertainty and distress. In the current review we aimed, by thorough search of the medical literature, to collect evidence on which to base decisions either to prohibit or allow the use of various medications in patients with G6PD deficiency. A literature search was conducted during May 2009 for studies and case reports on medication use and G6PD deficiency using the following sources: MEDLINE (1966-May 2009), PubMed (1950-May 2009), the Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2009), and major pharmacology, internal medicine, haematology and paediatric textbooks. After assessing the literature, we divided medications into one of three groups: medications that should be avoided in individuals with G6PD deficiency, medications that were considered unsafe by at least one source, but according to our review can probably be given safely in normal therapeutic dosages to individuals with G6PD deficiency as evidence does not contravene their use, and medications where no evidence at all was found to contravene their use in G6PD-deficient patients. It is reasonable to conclude that, over time, many compounds have been wrongly cited as causing haemolysis because they were administered to patients experiencing an infection-related haemolytic episode. We found solid evidence to prohibit only seven currently used medications: dapsone, methylthioninium chloride (methylene blue), nitrofurantoin, phenazopyridine, primaquine, rasburicase and tolonium chloride (toluidine blue). Regarding all other medications, our review found no evidence to contravene their use in normal therapeutic doses to G6PD-deficient patients. There is a need for evidence-based global consensus regarding medication use in G6PD-deficient patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 152 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Other 15 10%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 42 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#5,589,599
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#618
of 1,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,247
of 289,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#232
of 825 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,880 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 825 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.