Title |
Impact of a chronic disease self-management program on health care utilization in rural communities: a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-198 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Susan B Jaglal, Sara JT Guilcher, Gillian Hawker, Wendy Lou, Nancy M Salbach, Michael Manno, Merrick Zwarenstein |
Abstract |
Internationally, chronic disease self-management programs (CDSMPs) have been widely promoted with the assumption that confident, knowledgeable patients practicing self-management behavior will experience improved health and utilize fewer healthcare resources. However, there is a paucity of published data supporting this claim and the majority of the evidence is based on self-report. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 74 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Researcher | 7 | 9% |
Other | 15 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
Psychology | 4 | 5% |
Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,300,431
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,546
of 7,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,297
of 227,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#81
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.