↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and conduction…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony as determined by phase analysis of ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and conduction disturbances
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, April 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.01.041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A. Trimble, Salvador Borges-Neto, Stuart Smallheiser, Ji Chen, Emily F. Honeycutt, Linda K. Shaw, Jaekyeong Heo, Robert A. Pagnanelli, E. Lindsey Tauxe, Ernest V. Garcia, Fabio Esteves, Frank Seghatol-Eslami, G. Neal Kay, Ami E. Iskandrian

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is approved for the treatment of patients with advanced systolic heart failure and evidence of dyssynchrony on electrocardiograms. However, a significant percentage of patients do not demonstrate improvement with CRT. Echocardiographic techniques have been used for more accurate determination of dyssynchrony. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging has not previously been used to evaluate cardiac dyssynchrony. The objective of this study is to evaluate mechanical dyssynchrony as described by phase analysis of gated SPECT images in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, conduction delays, and ventricular paced rhythms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 32%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 71%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2007.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#1,303
of 2,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,875
of 87,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.