↓ Skip to main content

A biochemical and physicochemical comparison of two recombinant enzymes used for enzyme replacement therapies of hunter syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Glycoconjugate Journal, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
14 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
A biochemical and physicochemical comparison of two recombinant enzymes used for enzyme replacement therapies of hunter syndrome
Published in
Glycoconjugate Journal, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10719-014-9523-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yo Kyung Chung, Young Bae Sohn, Jong Mun Sohn, Jieun Lee, Mi Sun Chang, Younghee Kwun, Chi Hwa Kim, Jin Young Lee, Yeon Joo Yook, Ah-Ra Ko, Dong-Kyu Jin

Abstract

Mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome; OMIM 309900) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disease caused by a deficiency in the enzyme iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS), leading to accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). For enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) of Hunter syndrome, two recombinant enzymes, idursulfase (Elaprase®, Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Lexington, MA) and idursulfase beta (Hunterase®, Green Cross Corporation, Yongin, Korea), are currently available in Korea. To compare the biochemical and physicochemical differences between idursulfase and idursulfase beta, we examined the formylglycine (FGly) content, specific enzyme activity, mannose-6-phosphate (M6P) content, sialic acid content, and in vitro cell uptake activity of normal human fibroblasts of these two enzymes.The FGly content, which determines the enzyme activity, of idursulfase beta was significantly higher than that of idursulfase (79.4 ± 0.9 vs. 68.1 ± 2.2 %, P < 0.001). In accordance with the FGly content, the specific enzyme activity of idursulfase beta was significantly higher than that of idursulfase (42.6 ± 1.1 vs. 27.8 ± 0.9 nmol/min/μg protein, P < 0.001). The levels of M6P and sialic acid were not significantly different (2.4 ± 0.1 vs 2.4 ± 0.3 mol/mol protein for M6P and 12.3 ± 0.7 vs. 12.4 ± 0.4 mol/mol protein for sialic acid). However, the cellular uptake activity of the normal human fibroblasts in vitro showed a significant difference (Kuptake, 5.09 ± 0.96 vs. 6.50 ± 1.28 nM protein, P = 0.017).In conclusion, idursulfase beta exhibited significantly higher specific enzyme activity than idursulfase, resulting from higher FGly content. These biochemical differences may be partly attributed to clinical efficacy. However, long-term clinical evaluations of Hunter syndrome patients treated with these two enzymes will be needed to demonstrate the clinical implications of significant difference of the enzyme activity and the FGly content.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 40%
Student > Master 9 17%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,240,751
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Glycoconjugate Journal
#98
of 929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,389
of 241,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Glycoconjugate Journal
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.