↓ Skip to main content

A paradox in suicide statistics in estimating specificity of tests for suicide – Reply to Mushquash and co-workers and Culver

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychiatric Research, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A paradox in suicide statistics in estimating specificity of tests for suicide – Reply to Mushquash and co-workers and Culver
Published in
Journal of Psychiatric Research, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

L.H. Thorell, M. Wolfersdorf, R. Straub, J. Steyer, S. Hodgkinson, W.P. Kaschka, M. Jandl, K. Wahlin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 29%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,863,863
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#675
of 3,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,172
of 238,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#13
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.