↓ Skip to main content

Advice to follow a low-carbohydrate diet has a favourable impact on low-grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes compared with advice to follow a low-fat diet

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,671)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
37 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
183 X users
facebook
32 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advice to follow a low-carbohydrate diet has a favourable impact on low-grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes compared with advice to follow a low-fat diet
Published in
Annals of Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.3109/07853890.2014.894286
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lena Jonasson, Hans Guldbrand, Anna K. Lundberg, Fredrik H. Nystrom

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 183 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 253 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 17%
Student > Master 45 17%
Researcher 31 12%
Other 19 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 6%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 9%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 58 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 442. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#64,503
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Medicine
#9
of 1,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#428
of 245,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Medicine
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.